20 August—Dr. Judge Michael Peloquin must have something—anything—better to do than antagonize virtually everybody in Litchfield and threaten and otherwise harass any and all who dare to apprise the public of things—facts in the public domain—he would prefer to not have known. So why doesn’t he do it? But where’s the fun in that?

Dr. Judge Peloquin’s latest communication, received in an envelope addressed to “PAUL ROSENBERG, Litchfield Monitor,” at the wrong PO box (as usual), consists of a brief definition of libel and an abbreviated delineation of types of libel damages as well as the page reproduced below. We won’t even try to fathom Peloquin’s motivation therein, but we know it’s not to intimidate. Heaven forfend. Michael Peloquin surely wouldn’t do anything like that.

As you can see, Peloquin emphasizes virtually everything on the page in one way or another and for whatever reason or reasons. At the bottom of the page, under the hand written “READ dumb Rosenberg” heading, is a paragraph from the court’s decision in his case against Litchfield Planning & Zoning (LND-CV-24-61806420-S). Which he lost.

Peloquin takes some pride in pointing out that the court determined he “has been personally and specifically injured by the action taken by the board [Litchfield P&Z].” And there’s no denying that, although it’s irrelevant to the matter at hand. But it must also be pointed out that that paragraph refers specifically to the court’s determination that Peloquin was an aggrieved party and thus entitled to be a plaintiff in the litigation. Which he lost.

So here’s Peloquin’s latest opus: